Urdu Māhiyā and Its Technique
اردو ماہیا اور تکنیک
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63283/IRJ.04.01/21Keywords:
Urdu Literature, Punjabi Literature, Linguistic Borrowing, Māhiyā, Kāfī, Ṭappah, Dohṛā, Arabic and Persian Influence, Cultural Exchange, Poetic TraditionAbstract
Languages continuously evolve through interaction with other linguistic traditions and possess the capacity to assimilate words, idioms, proverbs, literary expressions, and genres from diverse sources. Urdu is particularly notable in this regard, as its historical development reflects an exceptional openness to linguistic and literary influences. It has extensively borrowed from major languages such as Arabic and Persian, incorporating not only vocabulary and idiomatic expressions but also a wide range of literary genres. Prominent poetic forms adopted and adapted by Urdu include qaṣīdah, sī ḥarfī, ghazal, rubāʿī, marsiyah, qiṭʿah, and mathnawī. Similarly, Urdu prose has benefited considerably from other literary traditions, incorporating major genres such as the novel, drama, and short story, which have subsequently become integral components of Urdu literature.In addition to Arabic and Persian influences, Punjabi language and literature have also played a significant role in the development and enrichment of Urdu. Urdu has incorporated numerous Punjabi words, idiomatic expressions, and poetic forms, including kāfī, ṭappah, dohṛā, and māhiyā. Of particular significance is the māhiyā, a traditional Punjabi poetic form that, despite experiencing a decline in its original literary context, gained renewed recognition and prominence after being adopted into Urdu. Over time, it developed into an established short poetic genre within Urdu literature. Numerous distinguished Urdu poets experimented with the māhiyā and contributed significantly to its literary development and popularization. This study therefore examines the process through which Punjabi literary traditions, particularly the māhiyā, were assimilated, transformed, and established within Urdu literary discourse.
References
ظہیر غازی پوری، ”اردو ماہیا— فن تکنیک اور موضوع “، مطبوعہ (لاہور: اوراق، جنوری فروری 1998ء)،ص274۔
حیدر قریشی، ”اردو میں ماہیا نگاری (تحقیق و تنقید)“، (اسلام آباد : فرہاد پبلی کیشنز 1997ء)،ص79۔
احمد ندیم قاسمی، ”پاکستان کے عوامی گیت “،(کراچی:ادارہٴ مطبوعات، 1964ء)، ص158۔
ارشد محمود ناشاد ، ڈاکٹر ، مطبوعہ ماہنامہ ،”بھنگڑا“، (گجرانوالہ :مارچ تاجون 1997ء)،ص 17۔
نصیر الدین نصیر گیلانی، پیر ،سید، ”کلیات ِنصیر گیلانی “، (اسلام آباد: مہریہ نصیر یہ پبلی کیشنز ، گولڑہ شریف،2019ء)، ص58۔
حیدر قریشی، ”اردو میں ماہیا نگاری (تحقیق و تنقید)“، (اسلام آباد : فرہاد پبلی کیشنز 1997ء)،ص79۔
عزیز فیضانی دار پوری، مرزا ”متاع ِعزیز“، (ایبٹ آباد : فیضانی مل لائبریری، 1984ء)، ص78۔
حیدر قریشی، ”اردو میں ماہیا نگاری (تحقیق و تنقید)“، (اسلام آباد : فرہاد پبلی کیشنز 1997ء)،ص106۔
حمید اللہ شاہ ہاشمی، ”پنجابی زبان وادب “،(کراچی: انجمن ترقی اردو پاکستان، 1988)،ص 322۔
