Critical Analysis of the RAND Report "The Muslim World after 9/11": Securitization, Bias, and the Erasure of Muslim Agency

Authors

  • Umaima Sami* MPhil Scholar, Department of Islamic Studies, University of Education, Lahore. Author
  • Dr. Muhammad Sajjad Malik Assistant Professor, Division of Islamic and Oriental Learning, University of Education, LMC, Lahore. Author

Keywords:

RAND Report, Securitization, Political Islam, Moderate Islam, Quranic Framework, Counterterrorism

Abstract

This article provides a critical analysis of the RAND Corporation's 2004 report "The Muslim World After 9/11," examining its methodological frameworks, analytical biases, and policy recommendations through the lens of Islamic normative principles and post-colonial critique. The 564-page study, commissioned by the United States Air Force, represents one of the most ambitious attempts by a Western strategic institution to map the religious, political, and social terrain of global Islam. Through detailed analysis of the report's treatment of nine regional contexts—the Middle East, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Palestine, Iraq and Syria, Turkey, Iran, Pakistan, India, Central Asia, Southeast Asia, West Africa, and Muslim diasporas—the article identifies systematic patterns of securitization, state-centric bias, secular normativity, and the instrumentalization of "moderate Islam." The article argues that the report's analytical framework reduces complex civilizational phenomena to security variables, privileges authoritarian allies over Islamist movements, assumes secular state structures as normative, and defines "moderate Islam" in terms of compatibility with Western policy interests rather than authentic Islamic theological criteria. Most significantly, the report systematically excludes self-reflection on Western policy—including the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the 2003 invasion of Iraq, support for authoritarian regimes, drone strikes, and colonial legacies—as drivers of radicalization. The article contrasts RAND's policy worldview with a Quranic framework grounded in Divine sovereignty, justice ('adl), consultation (shura), and accountability, arguing that a justice-centered approach offers a more ethical and effective alternative to securitized engagement with Muslim societies.

Author Biography

  • Umaima Sami*, MPhil Scholar, Department of Islamic Studies, University of Education, Lahore.

    *Corresponding Author

References

Abu Zayd, Nasr Hamid. Critique of Religious Discourse. Translated by Jonathan Wright. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2018. 45, 67, 89.

Cook, David. Understanding Jihad. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2005. 23, 45, 67, 89.

Euben, Roxanne L. Enemy in the Mirror: Islamic Fundamentalism and the Limits of Modern Rationalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999. 34, 56, 78.

El Fadl, Khaled Abou. The Great Theft: Wrestling Islam from the Extremists. New York: HarperOne, 2005. 78, 89, 124.

Halliday, Fred. Two Hours That Shook the World: September 11, 2001: Causes and Consequences. London: Saqi Books, 2002. 12, 34, 56.

Hoffman, Bruce. Inside Terrorism. New York: Columbia University Press, 2006. 45, 67, 89, 145.

Iqtidar, Humeira. "Redefining Moderate Islam: The Politics of Donor Driven Reform." Third World Quarterly 30, no. 5 (2009): 1001-1016. 1002-1005.

Kepel, Gilles. Jihad: The Trail of Political Islam. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002. 23, 45, 78, 112.

Kundnani, Arun. The Muslims Are Coming!: Islamophobia, Extremism, and the Domestic War on Terror. London: Verso, 2014. 12, 34, 56, 89.

Mamdani, Mahmood. Good Muslim, Bad Muslim: America, the Cold War, and the Roots of Terror. New York: Pantheon Books, 2004. 15, 34, 67, 89.

Mandaville, Peter. Islam and Politics in the Middle East. New York: Routledge, 2007. 45, 67, 89.

Moussalli, Ahmad S. Moderate and Radical Islamic Fundamentalism: The Quest for Modernity, Legitimacy, and the Islamic State. Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 1999. 23, 45, 67.

Nasr, Seyyed Vali Reza. The Shia Revival: How Conflicts Within Islam Will Shape the Future. New York: W.W. Norton, 2006. 34, 56, 78.

Rabasa, Angel, Cheryl Benard, Peter Chalk, C. Christine Fair, Theodore W. Karasik, Rollie Lal, Ian O. Lesser, and David E. Thaler. The Muslim World After 9/11. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, 2004. 43, 78, 89, 102.

Roy, Olivier. Globalized Islam: The Search for a New Ummah. New York: Columbia University Press, 2004. 34, 56, 78.

Said, Edward W. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books, 1978. 45, 67, 89

Said, Edward W. Covering Islam: How the Media and the Experts Determine How We See the Rest of the World. Revised ed. New York: Vintage Books, 1997. 23, 45, 67.

Zaman, Muhammad Qasim. Modern Islamic Thought in a Radical Age: Religious Authority and Internal Criticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. 56, 78, 90.

Downloads

Published

31-03-2026

How to Cite

Umaima Sami*, & Dr. Muhammad Sajjad Malik. (2026). Critical Analysis of the RAND Report "The Muslim World after 9/11": Securitization, Bias, and the Erasure of Muslim Agency. AL-ĪMĀN Research Journal, 4(01), 119-128. https://alimanjournal.com/ojs/index.php/home/article/view/287